Posts Tagged ‘risk’

What to Invest in?

Monday, April 20th, 2009

With all the economic mayhem happening these days you might be wondering… “where can I put my money so that it will”:

  • never lose 50% of it’s value over night
  • beat inflation and a little more
  • remain highly liquidatable in case of emergency
  • remain usable in case of apocalypse and total societal breakdown

The idea most people have in regard to savings and investment is to develop a security blanket.

The Chinese government is thinking the same thing as it pushes for a new super sovereign currency[1].

So I came across this article which says  to put your money in:

  • 25% in U.S. stocks, to provide a strong return during times of prosperity.
  • 25% in long-term U.S. Treasury bonds, which do well during prosperity and during deflation (but which do poorly during other economic cycles).
  • 25% in cash in order to hedge against periods of “tight money” or recession.
  • 25% in precious metals (gold, specifically) in order to provide protection during periods of inflation.

But I disagree… let’s look at the options.

U.S. Stocks

A diversified and broad selection of US stocks from the S&P 500 (the 500 largest companies in America) is a very safe and prosperous bet over the long term.  American companies have been and will continue to be some of the most innovative companies on the planet.  While some industries wane, others will wax.  Furthermore, the NYSE, NASDAQ and other trading arenas have some of the highest traffic, nearly guaranteeing a buyer for every seller.  My recommendation is to definitely put money in US stocks by purchasing index funds like the S&P 500 index.

The main advantages of US stocks is:

  1. Tracks with the US economy at large thus making the investment a hedge against inflation.
  2. A diversified portfolio does spread risk effectively.
  3. Stocks are not officially govt backed, but as we’ve seen… the larger the company the more likely subsidies and govt. protections will be involved.
  4. In booms and busts stocks can do well (Countrywide in the boom went way up, Netflix in the bust tripled).

To this I’d also like to add that European stock indexes are overall quite similar in advantage to the US.  Essentially, if the US and Europe can’t make it… nobody can.

Long Term Treasury Bonds

These are also very safe investments in the near and far term.  They are extremely safe (if the govt defaults on it’s loans then cashing out your bonds will be the least of your worries), and dependable.

But they have 2 very serious downsides.

  1. Buying a bond today for 30 years locks in an  interest rate.  Inflation may rise, but the interest rate wont.
  2. Many of the ‘worst case scenarios’ possible would render government bonds illiquid (same is mostly true for stocks).

Money Markets and ‘Cash’

Cash and money markets are extremely liquid.  They are not much more than a savings account with a low interest rate.  And even though they are extremely safe, like treasury bills they:

  1. Don’t protect against inflation
  2. Don’t have a very high growth rate
  3. Many of the ‘worst case scenarios’ would render the fiat money in the money market account nearly useless

Gold!

Perhaps the most misleading of investment vehicles is Gold.  It is a widely held belief that in times of great disaster gold or precious metals would be the only ’super-sovereign’ currency.  The belief is supported by the thought that humans assign inherent worth to gold.  They don’t!

Furthermore, it is believed that gold hedges against inflation.  Because of the first assumption, that gold is inherently worth something, we think that gold must track with inflation on a nearly 1:1 basis…. it doesn’t!

Thus gold has the following drawbacks:

  1. It doesn’t hedge against inflation:
  2. Most of the demand for Gold comes from Jewelry and for making into bouillon coins.  In bad times it will become an illiquid commodity.
  3. It’s growth is low on average.
  4. It’s easy to steal ($20k of gold is far easier to steal than $20k of stocks)
  5. In time of great chaos it doesn’t provide the function of a super-sovereign currency…real goods do[2].  Furthermore, if everyone used Gold as currency in the ‘bad-times’  rampant inflation would occur relative to the supply of gold in circulation… thus rendering moot the potential of Gold to serve as a currency.

Gold is perhaps one of the most worthless investments in the market unless you know something about the supply and demand cycle of Gold.

So What’s Left?

The following is a list of investments that I believe have the highest safety, return and hedge against inflation and Chaos.  It’s difficult to say what the % of your portfolio should be in each area… so no percent is given.

  1. U.S and European stocks are highly liquid, move with inflation but are not nuclear-apocalypse proof. A good place to put money.
  2. Housing Rental Income – barring a communist take over (and even with one), people need a place to live.  The income tracks with inflation, but can be depressed in a housing glut or in a very low interest rate time period.  Regardless, housing is the largest purchase that the average person can make.  It’s subsidized by the government in many ways and gives a large store of capital which appreciates with  inflation plus a little.  Add on to that the rents received over time and housing rental income can be a very good, safe and reliable investment.
  3. Education – the bulk of one’s lifetime wealth comes from wages.  It is well established that wage level is tied in with education level.  Plus learning thins like farming, mechanics, and carpentry could either give a little extra cash when needed or provide post-apocalypse survival skills.
  4. Family – Price of going to the nursing home for retirement… $50k/year.  Cost of living with a family you love and who loves you back until you die[3]… priceless.  Blood ties run thick and they’re worth having.
  5. Community/Friends/Civics – Nothing hedges against loneliness, hard times and even financial struggle than friends and a surrounding community.  By involving yourself in Civics you could also have a chance to set policies and change tax codes that directly affect your financial well being.  It only costs time.
  6. Land – As Lex Luther said in Super Man… they only thing they aren’t making any more of is land.  Rather than putting money into gold, put it into arable farm land.
  7. Religion – Hey, this life might not be all there is right?  Better find the truth about the metaphysical world… and supposing that God is an active and personal God then it might not be so bad to have him on your side no matter the circumstance.  I hear it can be good for your health too.

There you have it, the Greentheo plan to fail proof investments that do grow over time.

  1. China has been running enormous dollar surpluses to keep the yuan-dollar ratio low.  This keeps goods flowing to America and it’s economy growing more rapidly in the short term.  It also gave America extremely cheap credit. []
  2. what do starving people need with Gold?  nothing… what they need is food and other “real goods” []
  3. assuming you don’t annoy the Hell out of them in your crotchety old age []

What is a Depression?

Tuesday, March 10th, 2009

This post over at Calculated Risk (an interesting investment finance blog) explains the conventional view of a depression.  In short… we have a long way to go before we get to a depression.

 Even though the current recession is already one of the worst since 1947, it is only about 1/3 of the way to a depression (assuming a terrible Q1).

To reach a depression, the economy would have to decline at about a 6.6% annual rate each quarter for the next year.

The rest of the post is definitely worth reading if you interested in such things.

Poor math skills, the reason for the Great Recession

Friday, February 6th, 2009

In high school it’s all the rage for whiny students to ask their math teachers, “What good is math anyway?  When will we ever use it?”

Well, suppose the CEOs of America’s largest banks (Bank of America, Lehman Brothers, CitiBank, etc.) had paid a bit more attention in their statistics courses.   Had they done so, they might not have asked to lower capital requirements because their “mathematical models” did a better job at predicting borrower default rates and thus decreased overall risk.

But not only that, suppose the investors in the banks (whose money is all but gone) had understood that estimating the risk of catastrophic loss with a Gaussian distribution is not only difficult, but extremely prone to error.  If their math was a bit more rigorous might they have seen the risk and failed to invest?

But worst of all.  The SEC, the FDIC and several other regulatory agencies including the Federal Reserve should have known that loaning out 30 times what the banks had in capital reserve to traditionally high risk borrowers was not just mathematically potentially catastrophic, but the likelihood of a systemwide crash should converge to 100% over time given such high risk.

It doesn’t really take a mathematician to understand some of the math.  With any real literacy in Math or Statistics one would have quickly seen the flaw in the plan to entrust billions of dollars of investments to Gaussian models in the hands of bankers.

Just say no to GMO

Saturday, January 10th, 2009

I agree with this article’s analysis of anti-GMO movement, and why ultimately GMO’s need a lot more study before they become widely used.

Here are some highlights:

Gee, wouldn’t it be cool if we could genetically modify up some crops that produce like crazy and resist pests and drought? Then we’d have so much food we can solve world hunger!  … We have enough food in the world – we’d just rather throw it away than give it to people who can’t pay for it. 

In Rodale Institute’s farm systems trials that they’ve done for over 20 years, they found the best yield came from organics (compared to conventional & GMO crops) in most years. So the food grown with zero pesticides was more successful than the food grown with GMOs and pesticides.

But there’s something else you should know about Golden Rice. Because you might be saying to yourself “Well maybe it was a PR stunt but if it helps malnourished people get vitamin A then it’s still a good thing.” And that is correct… if that’s what were going on. As it turns out, you would have to eat 12 times more rice than normal75 to get all of your vitamin A from it. In other words, it’s a total sham.

 When you focus on the soil instead of manipulating the genes for one trait, you can maximize EVERYTHING at once. You can go for most nutrients, drought resistance, heat resistance, flood resistance, cold resistance, pest resistance, etc. Living soil will provide ALL of those things to the plant. After all, nature’s been perfecting its system for millions of years. So remind me again, why are we taking a huge risk to maximize ONE trait when we can take NO risk and get everything we want instead?