Posts Tagged ‘market’

What to Invest in?

Monday, April 20th, 2009

With all the economic mayhem happening these days you might be wondering... "where can I put my money so that it will":

  • never lose 50% of it's value over night
  • beat inflation and a little more
  • remain highly liquidatable in case of emergency
  • remain usable in case of apocalypse and total societal breakdown

The idea most people have in regard to savings and investment is to develop a security blanket.

The Chinese government is thinking the same thing as it pushes for a new super sovereign currency[1].

So I came across this article which says  to put your money in:

  • 25% in U.S. stocks, to provide a strong return during times of prosperity.
  • 25% in long-term U.S. Treasury bonds, which do well during prosperity and during deflation (but which do poorly during other economic cycles).
  • 25% in cash in order to hedge against periods of “tight money” or recession.
  • 25% in precious metals (gold, specifically) in order to provide protection during periods of inflation.

But I disagree... let's look at the options.

U.S. Stocks

A diversified and broad selection of US stocks from the S&P 500 (the 500 largest companies in America) is a very safe and prosperous bet over the long term.  American companies have been and will continue to be some of the most innovative companies on the planet.  While some industries wane, others will wax.  Furthermore, the NYSE, NASDAQ and other trading arenas have some of the highest traffic, nearly guaranteeing a buyer for every seller.  My recommendation is to definitely put money in US stocks by purchasing index funds like the S&P 500 index.

The main advantages of US stocks is:

  1. Tracks with the US economy at large thus making the investment a hedge against inflation.
  2. A diversified portfolio does spread risk effectively.
  3. Stocks are not officially govt backed, but as we've seen... the larger the company the more likely subsidies and govt. protections will be involved.
  4. In booms and busts stocks can do well (Countrywide in the boom went way up, Netflix in the bust tripled).

To this I'd also like to add that European stock indexes are overall quite similar in advantage to the US.  Essentially, if the US and Europe can't make it... nobody can.

Long Term Treasury Bonds

These are also very safe investments in the near and far term.  They are extremely safe (if the govt defaults on it's loans then cashing out your bonds will be the least of your worries), and dependable.

But they have 2 very serious downsides.

  1. Buying a bond today for 30 years locks in an  interest rate.  Inflation may rise, but the interest rate wont.
  2. Many of the 'worst case scenarios' possible would render government bonds illiquid (same is mostly true for stocks).

Money Markets and 'Cash'

Cash and money markets are extremely liquid.  They are not much more than a savings account with a low interest rate.  And even though they are extremely safe, like treasury bills they:

  1. Don't protect against inflation
  2. Don't have a very high growth rate
  3. Many of the 'worst case scenarios' would render the fiat money in the money market account nearly useless

Gold!

Perhaps the most misleading of investment vehicles is Gold.  It is a widely held belief that in times of great disaster gold or precious metals would be the only 'super-sovereign' currency.  The belief is supported by the thought that humans assign inherent worth to gold.  They don't!

Furthermore, it is believed that gold hedges against inflation.  Because of the first assumption, that gold is inherently worth something, we think that gold must track with inflation on a nearly 1:1 basis.... it doesn't!

Thus gold has the following drawbacks:

  1. It doesn't hedge against inflation:
  2. Most of the demand for Gold comes from Jewelry and for making into bouillon coins.  In bad times it will become an illiquid commodity.
  3. It's growth is low on average.
  4. It's easy to steal ($20k of gold is far easier to steal than $20k of stocks)
  5. In time of great chaos it doesn't provide the function of a super-sovereign currency...real goods do[2].  Furthermore, if everyone used Gold as currency in the 'bad-times'  rampant inflation would occur relative to the supply of gold in circulation... thus rendering moot the potential of Gold to serve as a currency.

Gold is perhaps one of the most worthless investments in the market unless you know something about the supply and demand cycle of Gold.

So What's Left?

The following is a list of investments that I believe have the highest safety, return and hedge against inflation and Chaos.  It's difficult to say what the % of your portfolio should be in each area... so no percent is given.

  1. U.S and European stocks are highly liquid, move with inflation but are not nuclear-apocalypse proof. A good place to put money.
  2. Housing Rental Income - barring a communist take over (and even with one), people need a place to live.  The income tracks with inflation, but can be depressed in a housing glut or in a very low interest rate time period.  Regardless, housing is the largest purchase that the average person can make.  It's subsidized by the government in many ways and gives a large store of capital which appreciates with  inflation plus a little.  Add on to that the rents received over time and housing rental income can be a very good, safe and reliable investment.
  3. Education - the bulk of one's lifetime wealth comes from wages.  It is well established that wage level is tied in with education level.  Plus learning thins like farming, mechanics, and carpentry could either give a little extra cash when needed or provide post-apocalypse survival skills.
  4. Family - Price of going to the nursing home for retirement... $50k/year.  Cost of living with a family you love and who loves you back until you die[3]... priceless.  Blood ties run thick and they're worth having.
  5. Community/Friends/Civics - Nothing hedges against loneliness, hard times and even financial struggle than friends and a surrounding community.  By involving yourself in Civics you could also have a chance to set policies and change tax codes that directly affect your financial well being.  It only costs time.
  6. Land - As Lex Luther said in Super Man... they only thing they aren't making any more of is land.  Rather than putting money into gold, put it into arable farm land.
  7. Religion - Hey, this life might not be all there is right?  Better find the truth about the metaphysical world... and supposing that God is an active and personal God then it might not be so bad to have him on your side no matter the circumstance.  I hear it can be good for your health too.

There you have it, the Greentheo plan to fail proof investments that do grow over time.

  1. China has been running enormous dollar surpluses to keep the yuan-dollar ratio low.  This keeps goods flowing to America and it's economy growing more rapidly in the short term.  It also gave America extremely cheap credit. []
  2. what do starving people need with Gold?  nothing... what they need is food and other "real goods" []
  3. assuming you don't annoy the Hell out of them in your crotchety old age []

Obstacle course or slip and slide

Monday, April 13th, 2009

I've recently been attempting to scope out a few email marketing solutions for a company I work for.  The hope is that in a few months we would make a purchase.

Under normally circumstances one might think that sales people would be falling all over themselves to make sure that I  have what I need to make my purchase right?  Especially in "this" economy (as it is so often called).

I expected too much it appears.

Instead of making my route to the product as slippery and easy as possible, every organization I've talked to thus far has put up more and more obstacles to my purchase.

Timothy Ferris (author of the 4 hour work week) says that when he removed himself as an obstacle to his sales and service processes that his business quadrupled nearly over night.

And so I ask... are you an obstacle to your own success?  Are you a gate keeper for your business/work/product/lifegoal preferring to have control over something rather than success?

If you are, then what might you do to become a slip and slide, a facilitator of transactions between others and your business/work/product/lifegoal?

If you have a good product, get out of the way and let the thing sell itself!

Marketing Psychology and the new Audi

Tuesday, April 7th, 2009

Have you seen the new Audi commercial? Watch the commercial below: (nope I'm not even getting paid to post it here)

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l8MTpaBUCpc[/youtube]

I saw the commercial last night and it bothered me until this morning.

Then I put my finger on it.  The marketers do a great job of subtly telling you that only by buying their product will self-actualization be attained.  While for years marketers have been urging us to keep up with the Jones, I had never seen materialism so subtly and clearly expressed.

Here's the subtext and buildup behind the advertisement which I saw playing during the Championship NCAA basketball game.

  1. It played during a time when many collegiately educated people are watching.
  2. Collegiately educated people generally have a higher disposable income.
  3. Collegiately educated people mainly work in office or 'white collar' or corporate jobs.  Large, corporations and group tend to strip people of their indivituating characteristics.
  4. All people desire to be unique, and loved for who they are.  This is self-actualization.
  5. Few people feel that they are really loved for who they are.
  6. As a culture we are shifting many of our values but one thing remains: individualism.

Thus this advertisement gathers a group of people who are by and large indistinguishable from each other at work,  at home,  education-wise and income-wise.  Many characterize this as the suburban lifestyle of 'quiet desperation' .

But enter the Audi SUV.  In reality the main distinction of the black Audi SUV and the gold generic SUV's is it's color.  But the text says it all... "Identity Theft".  Contrapositively, the text might have said 'Identity Protection'. The advertisement thus proposes to those without an identity (or those in danger of losing theirs) that an identity might be obtained or protected by owning the new Audi.  And so, in purchasing a new black Audi SUV, one remains part of the upper middle class pack but is now an individual.  One can remain educated, wealthy, and corporate, but now with a soul, an identity a self.

The Audi advertisement in short promises to restore selfhood to those who have lost all hope of being loved for who/what they are instead of what they own!   If you can't be loved for your self, be loved for what you own!

Yes, it is understood then by the audience that being loved for who you are is a fool's dream.  Only (poor, dirty, weird, lowly) hippies still believe in love!

It even goes so far as to insinuate that by owning an Audi one's children will again love and respect their parents.  The children exiting the school are bewildered and perhaps angry at their parents for failing to differentiate themselves materially.  But not little Johnny who fortunately has a 'cool' dad!

The truth is that by next year, the identity brought about by the new Audi is quite easy to steal.  A new identity will have to be found sooner or later.

I forgot how smart those marketers can be!

Linux = Silvio Gessel in Action

Monday, December 15th, 2008

Silvio Gesell was an economist concerned with the prosperity of the working class. Unlike Karl Marx,  Gesell did not believe in taking back the capital resources from the rich by force. Gesell instead believed that the capital of the wealthy was only valuable because it was in limited supply.  Therefore empowering the working masses could be achieved simply by producing surplus capital.  Surplus capital drives down the demand for capital, and as demand drops so too does price.  As price drops and demand drops, interest and rent on that capital drops.

For instance, rent is high on houses because there are a limited supply of houses.  If one can control a large amount of houses in a limited supply market, he can set the price for rent as he wishes.  Karl Marx proposed to take the property back from the landlords and return it to the people.  In Eastern Europe and Russia this socialization of capital was achieved, but with disastrous consequences: nobody aspired to be a landlord; nobody wanted to take responsibility for the upkeep and maintenance of housing.  When profit is decoupled from individual

Under Gesell, the better solution would be for the working class to unite, pitch in, and build a hundred new houses such that the overall rent market either could not be controlled or had excess capacity[1].  In a housing glut rent drops to zero, freeing up a significant portion of worker's wages to be used elsewhere.

Money can also be considered capital.  Under Karl Marx it is the job of the government is to redistribute wealth from the rich to the poor.  Money in this case is seen as a limited supply good.  Under Gesell, no redistribution is necessary.  The government simply taxes or devalues money (not wealth) periodically so that it is not worth hoarding.   Money must be spent or invested in order to obtain value.  Under Gesell the supply for money in circulation increases drastically, and interest rates must go down.  As interest rates go down general prosperity increases and the divide between the rich and poor decreases.

At the beginning of the 21st century we are now facing many challenges similar to the beginning of the 20th century.  Capital is in short supply, lending rates are low, and there is a sense of general panic in the market.  But, there is a bright spot in the economy which can't be ignored: open source.

In the 1970s and 80s as computer programming was becoming more and more popular and accessible to the masses, a movement was started to provide hobbyists, academics, and enthusiasts with free software.  These innovative thinkers were responding to a perceived threat by the capitalists to their hobby and passion: computer programming.

At the time, a UNIX operating system computer cost around $10,000.  Hardly anybody could afford to buy a personal computer.  And so the free software foundation was started.  Today the largest legacy of the free software foundation is GNU.  At the same time Linus Torvalds created a UNIX like operating system which is now known as Linux.  Linux and the GNU software were given away completely free with the only restriction being that one could not capitalize on the it[2].  The price of the same system running Linux dropped by 80% to an affordable $2,000.  Today more than 12% of the commercial server market runs Linux, while an undoubtedly large percent of the non-commerical server market prefers Linux to the main alternative Windows Server.[3].

Over the last 20 years Linux has attracted millions of computer programmer-hours... all for free.  Many of these programmers collect a wage from installing and maintaining the software for a client, but they don't make capital gains on the software.   This has allowed hundreds of thousands of workers to make a fair wage.[4]

In contrast Microsoft has kept their software closed, and therefore capitalized.  While its thousands of workers do make a fair wage, the real gain of Microsoft resides in the 1% of the company that benefits from the capitalization.  Furthermore the cost of Microsoft Windows is high enough that it excludes potential participants in a business that requires numerous licenses of Microsoft Windows from entering the market.

Aside from Linux, there are thousands if not millions of open-source software packages providing many of the daily services that an increasing number of people use.

The open source movement is not limited to software.  Imagine an economy where even jobs like engineering, teaching, construction, architecture and even restauranteering are open source, where those who most want to participate can contribute in the ways in which they are most skilled.  20 years ago few thought Open Source software engineering could ever be a profitable business model for anybody.  Now a very large portion of businesses rely on the Open Source software model to make it at all.

Open Sourcing and decapitalizing large pieces of our economy would truly be democracy in action at an unprecedented scale and it would provide prosperity such as we've not seen before for the average and lower class Americans whos main source of income is wages.

Go Linux!

  1. it's not that they give the houses away necessarily but perhaps they build them Amish style, a prerequisite for living in the community is to help raise barns or houses []
  2. without making significant modifications of their own []
  3. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux#Market_share_and_uptake []
  4. It should be noted that some Linux companies do make a capital gain on their modified versions of Linux, though the free price of a nearly equivalent Linux package keeps their overall profit down. []

A Global warming conspiracy

Monday, October 27th, 2008

As I'm getting into the futures market trading I thought up a possible dark and sinister consipiracy: Global Warming as a biasing factor in the futures markets.

My conspiracy theory goes something like this.

(more...)

A simple answer to our economic woes

Wednesday, October 15th, 2008

A while back a German economist by the name of Silvio Gesell wrote a book called the Natural Economic Order.  This book has received little attention amongst main stream economist but attracts a loyal following amongst intellectuals and otherwise far-out armchair philosophers.

His work gives us a simple answer to many of the economic woes this country has faced in the last 100 years since the creation of the Federal Reserve.  The answer is quite simple...  create money that systematically loses value over time.

silvio_gesell_1895.jpg

(more...)

How to get a deal... ask for it

Tuesday, October 7th, 2008

This article on Get Rich Slowly reminded me of something I learned this summer in Africa.

If you want a discount or a deal, the first step is to ask for it.  It's very uncomfortable at first.  Here in the States (and in Europe as well) it's very uncommon to bargain, dicker or otherwise pursue a lower price.  We live in a free and capitalist market right?  Well, why should the stated price always be the actual price?  If my stocks can fluctuate on a daily basis so should the things I commonly purchase.

Challenge yourself to ask for a discount... you'll be surprised at how often it works. Oh and don't accept the automatic "no" response on the first try either.  "No" is easy to say the first time, the second time is much harder, the third time is really difficult for anyone to say without feeling totally unreasonable.

Personal example: A couple friend of ours and Malia and I went to an art show in Denver a few weekends ago.  The show was closing in 30 minutes, but the stated admission price was $10.  I said, "$10 is kind of high given that there's only 30 minutes left... could we get a price break?"  They responded, "No... sorry".  Then our friend Marissa said, "What about for teachers?  Most of us are teachers here."  To which they responded, "Oh well for teachers sure!" And they lowered admission price to $5.