Posts Tagged ‘interest’

What to Invest in?

Monday, April 20th, 2009

With all the economic mayhem happening these days you might be wondering... "where can I put my money so that it will":

  • never lose 50% of it's value over night
  • beat inflation and a little more
  • remain highly liquidatable in case of emergency
  • remain usable in case of apocalypse and total societal breakdown

The idea most people have in regard to savings and investment is to develop a security blanket.

The Chinese government is thinking the same thing as it pushes for a new super sovereign currency[1].

So I came across this article which says  to put your money in:

  • 25% in U.S. stocks, to provide a strong return during times of prosperity.
  • 25% in long-term U.S. Treasury bonds, which do well during prosperity and during deflation (but which do poorly during other economic cycles).
  • 25% in cash in order to hedge against periods of “tight money” or recession.
  • 25% in precious metals (gold, specifically) in order to provide protection during periods of inflation.

But I disagree... let's look at the options.

U.S. Stocks

A diversified and broad selection of US stocks from the S&P 500 (the 500 largest companies in America) is a very safe and prosperous bet over the long term.  American companies have been and will continue to be some of the most innovative companies on the planet.  While some industries wane, others will wax.  Furthermore, the NYSE, NASDAQ and other trading arenas have some of the highest traffic, nearly guaranteeing a buyer for every seller.  My recommendation is to definitely put money in US stocks by purchasing index funds like the S&P 500 index.

The main advantages of US stocks is:

  1. Tracks with the US economy at large thus making the investment a hedge against inflation.
  2. A diversified portfolio does spread risk effectively.
  3. Stocks are not officially govt backed, but as we've seen... the larger the company the more likely subsidies and govt. protections will be involved.
  4. In booms and busts stocks can do well (Countrywide in the boom went way up, Netflix in the bust tripled).

To this I'd also like to add that European stock indexes are overall quite similar in advantage to the US.  Essentially, if the US and Europe can't make it... nobody can.

Long Term Treasury Bonds

These are also very safe investments in the near and far term.  They are extremely safe (if the govt defaults on it's loans then cashing out your bonds will be the least of your worries), and dependable.

But they have 2 very serious downsides.

  1. Buying a bond today for 30 years locks in an  interest rate.  Inflation may rise, but the interest rate wont.
  2. Many of the 'worst case scenarios' possible would render government bonds illiquid (same is mostly true for stocks).

Money Markets and 'Cash'

Cash and money markets are extremely liquid.  They are not much more than a savings account with a low interest rate.  And even though they are extremely safe, like treasury bills they:

  1. Don't protect against inflation
  2. Don't have a very high growth rate
  3. Many of the 'worst case scenarios' would render the fiat money in the money market account nearly useless

Gold!

Perhaps the most misleading of investment vehicles is Gold.  It is a widely held belief that in times of great disaster gold or precious metals would be the only 'super-sovereign' currency.  The belief is supported by the thought that humans assign inherent worth to gold.  They don't!

Furthermore, it is believed that gold hedges against inflation.  Because of the first assumption, that gold is inherently worth something, we think that gold must track with inflation on a nearly 1:1 basis.... it doesn't!

Thus gold has the following drawbacks:

  1. It doesn't hedge against inflation:
  2. Most of the demand for Gold comes from Jewelry and for making into bouillon coins.  In bad times it will become an illiquid commodity.
  3. It's growth is low on average.
  4. It's easy to steal ($20k of gold is far easier to steal than $20k of stocks)
  5. In time of great chaos it doesn't provide the function of a super-sovereign currency...real goods do[2].  Furthermore, if everyone used Gold as currency in the 'bad-times'  rampant inflation would occur relative to the supply of gold in circulation... thus rendering moot the potential of Gold to serve as a currency.

Gold is perhaps one of the most worthless investments in the market unless you know something about the supply and demand cycle of Gold.

So What's Left?

The following is a list of investments that I believe have the highest safety, return and hedge against inflation and Chaos.  It's difficult to say what the % of your portfolio should be in each area... so no percent is given.

  1. U.S and European stocks are highly liquid, move with inflation but are not nuclear-apocalypse proof. A good place to put money.
  2. Housing Rental Income - barring a communist take over (and even with one), people need a place to live.  The income tracks with inflation, but can be depressed in a housing glut or in a very low interest rate time period.  Regardless, housing is the largest purchase that the average person can make.  It's subsidized by the government in many ways and gives a large store of capital which appreciates with  inflation plus a little.  Add on to that the rents received over time and housing rental income can be a very good, safe and reliable investment.
  3. Education - the bulk of one's lifetime wealth comes from wages.  It is well established that wage level is tied in with education level.  Plus learning thins like farming, mechanics, and carpentry could either give a little extra cash when needed or provide post-apocalypse survival skills.
  4. Family - Price of going to the nursing home for retirement... $50k/year.  Cost of living with a family you love and who loves you back until you die[3]... priceless.  Blood ties run thick and they're worth having.
  5. Community/Friends/Civics - Nothing hedges against loneliness, hard times and even financial struggle than friends and a surrounding community.  By involving yourself in Civics you could also have a chance to set policies and change tax codes that directly affect your financial well being.  It only costs time.
  6. Land - As Lex Luther said in Super Man... they only thing they aren't making any more of is land.  Rather than putting money into gold, put it into arable farm land.
  7. Religion - Hey, this life might not be all there is right?  Better find the truth about the metaphysical world... and supposing that God is an active and personal God then it might not be so bad to have him on your side no matter the circumstance.  I hear it can be good for your health too.

There you have it, the Greentheo plan to fail proof investments that do grow over time.

  1. China has been running enormous dollar surpluses to keep the yuan-dollar ratio low.  This keeps goods flowing to America and it's economy growing more rapidly in the short term.  It also gave America extremely cheap credit. []
  2. what do starving people need with Gold?  nothing... what they need is food and other "real goods" []
  3. assuming you don't annoy the Hell out of them in your crotchety old age []

What is a Depression?

Tuesday, March 10th, 2009

This post over at Calculated Risk (an interesting investment finance blog) explains the conventional view of a depression.  In short... we have a long way to go before we get to a depression.

 Even though the current recession is already one of the worst since 1947, it is only about 1/3 of the way to a depression (assuming a terrible Q1).

To reach a depression, the economy would have to decline at about a 6.6% annual rate each quarter for the next year.

The rest of the post is definitely worth reading if you interested in such things.

Local currency as a hedge against tyrrany

Friday, January 2nd, 2009

Recently one of my favorite topics to post about has been the free money system envisioned by Silvio Gesell.  The money isn't 'free' like monopoly money, but free as in it it's free to work without the constraint of interest.

There is another way to stimulate a local economy though and that's with a local currency.  While local currency has mixed success, in theory a local currency acts as a boost to local businesses.  Local currency must be spent in the neighborhood and thus it must remain in the neighborhood.  When money stays in a system it can stop some of the problems created by an imbalanced import/export rate.

But perhaps there is another reason for local currency to become more popular, local currency is a hedge against tyranny.

All tyrannical leaders/governments seek to exercise control over the masses economically.  Currency is the primary means of exchange in an economy and thus control over the currency lends itself very well to control over the economy and control over the people.

The NSA understands very well that financial data is a great indicator of a person's activities... which is why they monitor financial activity first and foremost in their search for domestic and international terrorists. They need not spy on a person with binoculars when they have a microscope attached to your credit card transactions!

Furthermore, if a political body in a country should wish to exercise economic control on its people, a few key changes in interest rates, money supply, and tax rates are quite effective tools[1].

While a nationalised currency is generally a good thing it also lends itself to tyranny very well.

And so for the health of a country, and the privacy and freedom of it's citizens, parallel currencies to the dollar need to be developed.  These currencies will not only protect our freedom but promote our local economy.  This will lead to a better more democratic and more prosperous America.

  1. e.g. drop interest to 0 and kill the upper classes... e.g. raise interest and taxes and kill the middle class []

Linux = Silvio Gessel in Action

Monday, December 15th, 2008

Silvio Gesell was an economist concerned with the prosperity of the working class. Unlike Karl Marx,  Gesell did not believe in taking back the capital resources from the rich by force. Gesell instead believed that the capital of the wealthy was only valuable because it was in limited supply.  Therefore empowering the working masses could be achieved simply by producing surplus capital.  Surplus capital drives down the demand for capital, and as demand drops so too does price.  As price drops and demand drops, interest and rent on that capital drops.

For instance, rent is high on houses because there are a limited supply of houses.  If one can control a large amount of houses in a limited supply market, he can set the price for rent as he wishes.  Karl Marx proposed to take the property back from the landlords and return it to the people.  In Eastern Europe and Russia this socialization of capital was achieved, but with disastrous consequences: nobody aspired to be a landlord; nobody wanted to take responsibility for the upkeep and maintenance of housing.  When profit is decoupled from individual

Under Gesell, the better solution would be for the working class to unite, pitch in, and build a hundred new houses such that the overall rent market either could not be controlled or had excess capacity[1].  In a housing glut rent drops to zero, freeing up a significant portion of worker's wages to be used elsewhere.

Money can also be considered capital.  Under Karl Marx it is the job of the government is to redistribute wealth from the rich to the poor.  Money in this case is seen as a limited supply good.  Under Gesell, no redistribution is necessary.  The government simply taxes or devalues money (not wealth) periodically so that it is not worth hoarding.   Money must be spent or invested in order to obtain value.  Under Gesell the supply for money in circulation increases drastically, and interest rates must go down.  As interest rates go down general prosperity increases and the divide between the rich and poor decreases.

At the beginning of the 21st century we are now facing many challenges similar to the beginning of the 20th century.  Capital is in short supply, lending rates are low, and there is a sense of general panic in the market.  But, there is a bright spot in the economy which can't be ignored: open source.

In the 1970s and 80s as computer programming was becoming more and more popular and accessible to the masses, a movement was started to provide hobbyists, academics, and enthusiasts with free software.  These innovative thinkers were responding to a perceived threat by the capitalists to their hobby and passion: computer programming.

At the time, a UNIX operating system computer cost around $10,000.  Hardly anybody could afford to buy a personal computer.  And so the free software foundation was started.  Today the largest legacy of the free software foundation is GNU.  At the same time Linus Torvalds created a UNIX like operating system which is now known as Linux.  Linux and the GNU software were given away completely free with the only restriction being that one could not capitalize on the it[2].  The price of the same system running Linux dropped by 80% to an affordable $2,000.  Today more than 12% of the commercial server market runs Linux, while an undoubtedly large percent of the non-commerical server market prefers Linux to the main alternative Windows Server.[3].

Over the last 20 years Linux has attracted millions of computer programmer-hours... all for free.  Many of these programmers collect a wage from installing and maintaining the software for a client, but they don't make capital gains on the software.   This has allowed hundreds of thousands of workers to make a fair wage.[4]

In contrast Microsoft has kept their software closed, and therefore capitalized.  While its thousands of workers do make a fair wage, the real gain of Microsoft resides in the 1% of the company that benefits from the capitalization.  Furthermore the cost of Microsoft Windows is high enough that it excludes potential participants in a business that requires numerous licenses of Microsoft Windows from entering the market.

Aside from Linux, there are thousands if not millions of open-source software packages providing many of the daily services that an increasing number of people use.

The open source movement is not limited to software.  Imagine an economy where even jobs like engineering, teaching, construction, architecture and even restauranteering are open source, where those who most want to participate can contribute in the ways in which they are most skilled.  20 years ago few thought Open Source software engineering could ever be a profitable business model for anybody.  Now a very large portion of businesses rely on the Open Source software model to make it at all.

Open Sourcing and decapitalizing large pieces of our economy would truly be democracy in action at an unprecedented scale and it would provide prosperity such as we've not seen before for the average and lower class Americans whos main source of income is wages.

Go Linux!

  1. it's not that they give the houses away necessarily but perhaps they build them Amish style, a prerequisite for living in the community is to help raise barns or houses []
  2. without making significant modifications of their own []
  3. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux#Market_share_and_uptake []
  4. It should be noted that some Linux companies do make a capital gain on their modified versions of Linux, though the free price of a nearly equivalent Linux package keeps their overall profit down. []

Bailout Sleuth

Monday, November 17th, 2008

Since the Federal Reserve and congress don't deem it necessary to disclose who they're giving money out to under the TARP (Troubled Asset Relief Program) Mark Cuban (owner of the Dallas Mavericks basketball) has helped start a new website:

www.bailoutsleuth.com

To keep track of it for them.

Several lawsuits have been filed under the freedom of Information Act and yet the Fed still (even though mandated under law) refuses to disclose which banks they are lending money too.  And it's not just the $700 billion that congress approved a few months ago.  They are apparently also excercising the "right" to give cheap loans to whomever they care to, unless of course you're a regular ol' Joe, then you have to pay prime+bank interest.  Some $2 trillion in unidentified loans has been given out in the last couple of months.

So I guess while the big boys get loans at 0.25% I'm still stuck with a mortgage at nearly 7% and a school loan at about the same.  Where do I sign up for my piece of the TARP?

Welcome to the new era of Robber Baron early 20th century style capitalism, hope it's working out for you.

A simple answer to our economic woes

Wednesday, October 15th, 2008

A while back a German economist by the name of Silvio Gesell wrote a book called the Natural Economic Order.  This book has received little attention amongst main stream economist but attracts a loyal following amongst intellectuals and otherwise far-out armchair philosophers.

His work gives us a simple answer to many of the economic woes this country has faced in the last 100 years since the creation of the Federal Reserve.  The answer is quite simple...  create money that systematically loses value over time.

silvio_gesell_1895.jpg

(more...)